
Japan is a destination and transit country for men, women, and  children trafficked for the purposes of commercial sexual exploitation  and forced labor. Women and children trafficked to Japan for commercial  sexual exploitation come from the People’s Republic of China, South  Korea, Southeast Asia, Eastern Europe, Russia, and, to a lesser extent,  Latin America. Japan is a transit country for persons trafficked from  East Asia to North America. The majority of identified trafficking  victims are foreign women who migrate to Japan seeking work, but are  subjected upon arrival to debt bondage and forced prostitution. Male and  female migrant workers are subjected to conditions of forced labor.  Traffickers use debt bondage to exploit women in Japan’s large sex  trade, imposing debts of up to $50,000. In addition, trafficked women  are subjected to coercive or violent physical and psychological methods  to prevent them from seeking assistance or escaping. Traffickers also  target Japanese women and girls for exploitation in pornography or  prostitution. Many female victims, both foreign and Japanese, are  reluctant to seek help from authorities for fear of reprisals by their  traffickers, who are often members or associates of Japanese organized  crime syndicates (the Yakuza). Japanese men continue to be a significant  source of demand for child sex tourism in Southeast Asia.
The Government of Japan does not fully comply with the minimum  standards for the elimination of trafficking; however, it is making  significant efforts to do so. While Japan continued to implement reforms  through its Inter-Ministerial Liaison Committee on trafficking in  persons, the government’s efforts to identify and protect victims of  trafficking remained inadequate. In addition, prosecutions decreased  from the previous year. Law enforcement authorities and other officials  did not systematically employ formal victim identification procedures,  resulting in the government’s failure to recognize many trafficking  victims. The number of victims identified and assisted by Japanese  authorities fell for the second year in a row, but based on calls to  victim hotlines and interviews with victims, NGOs and researchers  believe the number of actual victims exceeds government statistics. Some  observers attribute the decline in identified victims to the difficulty  of investigating sex businesses that are increasingly moving  underground due to police crackdowns on red-light districts in major  cities. This increased pressure from law enforcement has eliminated  visible prostitution and forced many sex businesses to thinly disguise  prostitution as “delivery health” (escort) services.
 
Prosecution
There was no improvement in the Government of Japan’s efforts to  address sex trafficking through law enforcement during the reporting  period, and the government failed to address the problem of trafficking  for labor exploitation. Prosecutions for sex trafficking decreased in  2007, as 11 sex trafficking cases were prosecuted, and 12 trafficking  offenders were convicted, compared to 17 prosecutions and 15 convictions  in 2006. Of the 12 convictions in 2007, seven offenders received prison  sentences of two to four years with labor; five offenders received  suspended sentences. The only labor trafficking convictions in 2007 were  for two cases prosecuted under the Labor Standards Law. While Japan  does not have a comprehensive anti-trafficking law, a variety of laws,  including the 2005 amendment to the criminal code, the Labor Standards  Law, the Employment Security Law, the Prostitution Prevention Law, the  Child Welfare Law, and the Law for Punishing Acts related to Child  Prostitution and Child Pornography, cover most, but not all forms of  trafficking. Specifically, Japanese law does not prohibit recruitment of  laborers using knowingly fraudulent or deceptive offers for purposes of  forced labor. Labor exploitation was widely reported by labor  activists, NGOs, shelters, and the media. The Immigration Bureau and  Labor Standard Inspection Bodies reported hundreds of abuses of the  Industrial Trainee and Technical Internship Program (the “foreign  trainee program”). Reported abuses included fraudulent terms of  employment, debt bondage, restrictions on movement, and withholding of  salary payments. While the majority of companies employ foreign trainees  appropriately, participants in the first year of the three-year program  were not protected by labor laws and were therefore vulnerable to  trafficking. In addition, such exploitation was not limited to  participants in the first year of the program. There were only two  convictions for labor trafficking during the past two years despite  Labor Standard Inspection Bodies having identified more than 1,209  violations of labor laws in 2006 alone, indicating a serious lack of  will by the government to enforce these laws. The government did make  some efforts to address oversight of the foreign trainee program. The  Ministry of Justice released a list of prohibited acts to govern the  program, but there were no criminal penalties for companies found in  violation of the regulations. The Cabinet approved provisions to reform  the program, including applying the Labor Standards Law to the first  year; but, these provisions had not yet taken effect or even been  debated by the Diet during the reporting period. These measures are  unlikely to have any effect on the problem without a significant  increase in enforcement of labor laws.
[1]
 Protection
Despite the government’s increased efforts, victim protection  remained inadequate during the reporting period. The number of  trafficking victims identified by the Japanese government declined for  the second consecutive year. Law enforcement authorities identified 43  victims in 2007, down from 58 in 2006 and 116 in 2005. This number is  disproportionately low relative to the suspected magnitude of Japan’s  trafficking problem. Although some observers speculate there are fewer  victims identified because sex trafficking may have decreased in Japan,  it is more likely the move of many sex businesses underground has made  it more difficult for police to investigate and rescue potential  victims. NGOs working with trafficking victims continue to assert the  government is not proactive in searching for victims among vulnerable  populations such as foreign women in the sex trade or migrant laborers.  Of particular concern was the Japanese government’s repatriation of 16  of the 43 identified trafficking victims without referring them to IOM  for risk assessment and formal repatriation processing. Although police  and immigration authorities take part in regular training programs,  Japan has not adopted formal victim identification procedures, nor does  it dedicate government law enforcement or social services personnel  specifically to the human trafficking issue. During the reporting  period, police and immigration authorities failed to consistently  identify trafficking victims. Officials from third-country embassies  reported Japanese police and immigration officers failed to recognize  their citizens as trafficking victims, forcing the embassies to take  charge of victim repatriation. In addition, the government did not  recognize any victims of labor trafficking during the reporting period  in spite of widespread reports of labor exploitation by both official  and private entities. Forty of the 43 identified trafficking victims in  2007 were provided services by government shelters— Women’s Consulting  Centers (WCCs)—located in each of Japan’s 47 prefectures. The victims  had access to subsidized medical care and some victims received  psychological care while in the WCCs. However, the large majority of  trafficking victims did not have adequate access to trained  psychological counselors with native language ability, a weakness the  Japanese government is now beginning to address. The Ministry of Health,  Labor, and Welfare surveyed the NGO community to identify interpreters  with experience or training in providing counseling and psychological  care to victims of trafficking, and has begun to make this information  accessible to WCCs nationwide. Although the government asserts that  legal assistance is available to all trafficking victims, a survey of  WCC operators indicated that neither WCC staff nor victims were  consistently aware free legal assistance was available. To date there  have been no cases where the government actually provided legal  assistance to a trafficking victim. Although victims were eligible for  special stay status as a legal alternative to repatriation in cases  where victims would face hardship or retribution, NGOs report most  victims were unaware they could extend this status or apply for a change  of status to one which permits employment. Moreover, there has never  been a case of a victim staying in Japan for more than a few months. The  lack of native language counseling, the isolation of victims from  fellow nationals and other trafficking victims, and the lack of  alternatives—particularly any option to work or generate income while in  Japan—led most victims to choose an expeditious repatriation to their  home country. Although the government encouraged victims to assist in  the investigation and prosecution of trafficking crimes, it did not  provide victims with an environment conducive to cooperation. Japan gave  $300,000 to IOM in 2007 for repatriation and reintegration assistance,  and budgets about $100,000 each year for subsidizing victims’ care in  private NGO shelters that specialize in assisting trafficking victims.
Prevention
The Government of Japan demonstrated strong efforts to raise  awareness about some forms of trafficking during the reporting period.  The government took efforts to reduce the demand for commercial sexual  exploitation through the distribution of 500,000 brochures on the trauma  of trafficking, government anti-trafficking efforts, and how to receive  victim assistance. The government also produced 25,000 trafficking  awareness posters portraying the link between prostitution and  trafficking in persons. The posters and brochures were distributed to  immigration offices, police stations, and foreign embassies and  consulates throughout Japan. The government donated $79,000 to a Thai  NGO to construct a dormitory for Thai students vulnerable to  trafficking. A significant number of Japanese men continue to travel to  other Asian countries, particularly the Philippines, Cambodia, and  Thailand, to engage in sex with children. Although the Act on Punishment  of Activities Relating to Child Prostitution and Child Pornography and  the Protection of Children provides Japanese courts with  extraterritorial jurisdiction over Japanese nationals who have sexual  intercourse with a minor in a foreign country, the government has not  prosecuted a Japanese national for child sex tourism since 2005. During  the reporting period, the government did not take any steps to  specifically reduce the demand for child sex tourism by Japanese  nationals. Japanese law does not criminalize the possession of child  pornography, and this continues to contribute to the demand for  commercial sexual exploitation of children and child sex tourism.  According to National Police Agency statistics, 773 Japanese children  were either prostituted or exploited in child pornography during the  first half of 2007. Japan has not ratified the 2000 UN TIP Protocol

 
No comments:
Post a Comment